Language Skills and Active Listening

16 11 2009

Facebook

Debate on Facebook

People who speak more than 4 languages are usually bad listeners because are used to understand 20% and imagine the rest.

El 28 de octubre a las 14:07 · Comentar · Me gusta
A Friend A le gusta esto.

Friend B: pues vaya… y si hablas solo 4?
El 28 de octubre a las 14:18 · Eliminar

Author: Es gradual. Yo creo que esto es cierto si son idiomas que has aprendido (no idiomas nativos). El proceso de aprender un idioma es basicamente imaginar mucho aunque se entienda poco. Por eso cuando uno aprende varios idiomas se mal-acostumbra a no escuchar. No crees?
El 28 de octubre a las 14:21 · Eliminar

Friend B: pues no se… para mi 3 de los 4 son nativos.. bueno igual 2 de 4 porque realmente no se donde aprendi castellano…
pienso que imaginas mucho en la primera parte del aprendizaje.. cuando no te enteras de casi nada.. pero pasado un tiempo escuchas mas porque entiendes mas y viceversa… todo es fomentar la cosa neuronal, no?
El 28 de octubre a las 14:28 · Eliminar

Friend C: Sólo si son idiomas que has aprendido? ¿Se puede tener 5 idiomas nativos?
El 28 de octubre a las 17:19 · Eliminar

Author: Yo creo que tener 3 idiomas nativos es algo bastante “doable” si por ejemplo tu padre y tu madre hablan idiomas differentes y naces en un pais con un tercer idioma. Yo creo que si aprendes los idiomas nativamente seras un escuchador normal y si los aprendes estudiando seras un mal escuchador.
El 28 de octubre a las 18:21 · Eliminar

Friend D: A lo mejor entienden mas informacion no verbal, no? Uno se tiene que apoyar en otras fuentes de informacion. Conoces la serie “Lie to me”?
El 28 de octubre a las 23:05 · Eliminar

Friend D: La cuestion es: ¿desde cuando eres mal escuchador? Porque quiza ya lo fueras desde antes de aprender aleman, frances y chino y tu grado de “escuchacion” no haya ido empeorando con cada idioma nuevo sino que se ha mantenido estable.




Financial Reforms and the Millenium Bridge

12 11 2009

The lecture given by Professor Sapra about the counterproductive aspects of some of the accouting measures US legislators are considering in order to strengthen the financial sector has been one of the best I have ever had in my whole life.

According to Professor Sapra:

  • Increasing the reporting frequency is an incentive for managers to focus in the short-term and neglect long-run growth, which is bad for the economy
  • Using fair market values in finacial statements will increase volatility in financial reports, companies will react more to the actions of other companies than to the fair value of fundamentals.
    • Analogy: The Millenium Bridge in London was built in with a special suspension design that allowed the bridge to react to vibrations, like the steps of people. The problem was that people tend to walk at the same pace, especially if there are many people and the bridge is vibrating. As a result of people moving at the same time, the bridge enters oscillates too much. The Millenium Bridge was closed for 18 months after its opening to change the suspension system.

    The comparison with the Millenium Bridge Professor Sapra made, together with the clarity of his explanations and his sense of humor, made this lecture so great and memorable.





    What do we really know about the spread of AIDS?

    11 11 2009

    Professor Oster is my teacher of micro-economics at Chicago Booth.

    I would like to talk about her absolutely amazing presentation at TED. Professor Oster rebates many of the believes that are commonly accepted about AIDS in Africa:

    1. 25 Million people infected with AIDS in Africa
    2. If we decrease poverty, we will decrease AIDS
    3. African countries should follow the example of Uganda to combat AIDS. Uganda’s AIDS policy is based on education

    What is really amazing and innovative about Professor Oster is that she is using economics to decipher a problem that is usually part of epidemiology or public health.





    Unrestricted Work Authorization in the US

    9 11 2009
    Green Card in the US

    Green Card in the US

    One of the biggest challenges for international MBA students in the US is landing into a full-time position in a company willing to sponsor their working visa.

    Unfortunately, the number of companies willing to sponsor international candidates is very small (except in consulting).

    The Myths

    1) Visa sponsorship involves additional costs.

    FALSE. This is only around 5000 USD, which is much less than the salary they will pay you (hopefully!)

    2) It is difficult to justify that you hire a foreigner because the required skills cannot be found in the US.

    FALSE. It depends on how specific you are about skills in the visa application. You cannot just justify it based on the requirement to have an MBA degree and experience in industry A, because there are thousands of American falling in that description. But you are much more credible if you say you need somebody with experience developing operations strategy in industry A in country B, with experience dealing with senior management and leading multi-cultural teams, with intra-preneurial experience, fluent in language A and language B, with contacts in industry C, with a diploma thesis in field D… Not surprisingly, the way you write the Visa application influences the result.

    The Reason

    The main reason why companies choose not to sponsor is because the US Government can refuse a visa application without any explanation. The extension of a previously awarded visa can also be refused without any explanation. Companies do not like taking this risk. Only companies with the resources to lobby the government adequately are comfortable with this risk. The real problem is that the Government is not reliable regarding visa applications.

    On top of that, the TARP program (Troubled Asset Release Program) of the US government makes things even more difficult for international MBA students, especially those interested in Banking. The TARP program is a US government initiative to address the subprime mortgage crisis and strengthen its financial sector. TARP states that companies receiving funds under TARP cannot sponsor an international student if they make an American worker redundant.

    The Long Term Implications

    If you look at American history, this country is currently the number one in the world because it has traditionally sourced talent from anywhere in the world. If this practice stops now, this will no longer be the US in 50 years. It will just be a second range country somewhere in the North of the Gulf of Mexico.

    Additional Resources: TARP

    Read this interesting  article from scholarship for USA about the impact of TARP program  on job opportunities for international students.





    Chicago Booth Approach to Management Education

    8 11 2009
    Approach

    Approach

    This post expresses what Dean Edward A. Snyder’s  welcome speech to the class of 2011 means to me. Some people may argue that statement of principles and values are just statements and have little connection with real practices. But I believe that sometimes it is important to step back and think about the meaning of what you are doing.

    The University of Chicago is renowned for its schools of thought. Each school has its own approach for an specific discipline: Chicago approach to sociology, Chicago approach to economics, Chicago approach to physics, Chicago approach to literary criticism….

    What is Chicago Approach to Management Education?

    • Discipline-based knowledge : Business problems are complex and involve many disciplines. To understand organizations, markets, competition and succeed in business, you need knowledge from psychology, sociology, econometrics,  marketing… Other business schools focus on industries rather than on disciplines and neglect the multi-dimensional nature of business.
    • Empirical knowledge: Chicago Booth believes in facts.
    • Analysis: Good decisions are backed by good analysis. Analysis for Chicago Booth is discussing, challenging, fine-tuning ideas and deciding about them. The best idea is a provisional best idea. (See my post about this: What is Chicago Booth all about?). Booth is one of the few schools that focuses on the importance of decisions.
    • Fundamental principles: Effective business practices should be based on fundamental principles, not on furors or fads.

    So, What is Chicago strategy, then?

    • Values: Chicago believes on an unified system of values. We should have the same values at home, at the school, at work, in our country, in other countries, when doing research, when teaching…
    • Relations: every relation is important. Relations is helping each other, asking for help, giving help. We are receiving much support from second-year students, from alumni…
    • Respect for diversity: new ideas stem from diversity. We need to cherish diversity.

    Picture: belongs to wikipedia.com





    Consulting Terminology: A.T. Kearney, Bain, BCG, Booz, McKinsey

    3 11 2009

    This post is dedicated to all those MBA students recruiting for consulting. The first difference among consulting firms you realize when you are recruiting is their terminology. I would like to bring some light to this.

    MBAs apply to the row underlined.

    A.T. KEARNEY BAIN BCG BOOZ MCKINSEY
    Business Analyst Associate Consultant Associate Consultant Business Analyist
    Senior Business Analyst Senior Associate Consultant
    Associate Consultant Consultant Associate Associate
    Manager Case Team Leader Project Leader Senior Associate Engagement Manager
    Principal Manager Principal Principal Assocaite Principal
    Officer Partner Partner Partner Partner
    Director
    Projects Cases Cases Projects Engagements
    Feng Shui Consultant

    Feng Shui Consultant (www.spi-visual.co.uk)