Chicago Booth European Conference 2010

10 05 2010

The European Business Group (EBG) hosted on last Monday, April 12th, its first European Conference, that gathered some of the most outstanding European and North American leaders of the political and corporate world under the theme “Exploring Challenges and Opportunities for EU/US business”.

One of the guest of honor at the conference was Mr. Jose Maria Aznar, former Prime Minister of Spain, who opened the event with a speech about the importance of transatlantic relations for the future of Europe. Mr. Aznar lamented that the current US administration is giving lower importance to this relation with Europe in favor of other regions of the world, in particular Asia and Middle East. Mr. Aznar also placed special emphasis on the necessity of creating a free market without transatlantic trade barriers and do not fall into the old temptation of protectionism as a response to the current economic crisis. Mr. Aznar explained that the liberalization of the transatlantic market regarding services, capital and knowledge is necessary to improve the competitiveness of the European Union. According to Mr. Aznar, these political and economic reforms must be accompanied by a strong commitment to the defense of freedom against the threat of totalitarianism, global terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. In this sense, NATO must take a leading role in the fight against terrorism.

The conference then hosted three panel discussions and a lunch keynote. The topic of the first panel discussion of the conference, Messrs. Alessandro Motta, Martin Rouine, Javier Ruperez and Dirk Willen Schiff, respectively Consul Generals of Italy, Ireland, Spain and the Netherlands in Chicago, discussed about the particular features of the economies of their countries, and identified the major weaknesses of the EU’s lack of a genuine common fiscal and economic policy.

The next panel focused on Innovation and Competitiveness, included representatives from the Case New Holland / Fiat Group, DSM Desotech, NAVTEQ, Aviva North America and the EU Delegation to the US. After the panel, Mr. Abe Tomas Hughes, Vice President Director of Business Development  of Case New Holland / Fiat Group for the Americas made a keynote speech about  “International Business and the
MBA – A Hands-On Perspective”.

The third panel addressed the Future of Transatlantic Finance, where executives of Deutsche bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and JP Morgan Securities, Inc. made a thorough analysis of the current financial panorama in Europe and the US.

Mr. Yiannos Papantoniou, former Minister for National Economy and Finance of Greece, was in charge of closing the conference with a speech and a round of questions about the Euro Crisis. According to Mr. Papantoniou, “The absence of a central supervisory authority for the financial system has created doubts as to the ability of the weaker member-countries to bail out their banks. Credit risks spread sharply so that over-indebted countries such as Greece started to borrow at much higher interest rates in relation to Germany. This tendency, reinforced by negative ratings by international agencies, may lead to credit crises, even to default. The Greek crisis has highlighted the fact that the euro is a monetary union but not a political union. It does possess a central bank, but not a Treasury. The central bank can provide liquidity in times of crisis, though only a Treasury can address problems of solvency.”

Finally Mr. Papantoniou highlighted that the Euro Crisis does also represent an opportunity for a leap forward in the integration process. “Difficult as it may seem today, unification should proceed to higher levels so that Europe attains a stronger position in the international system”, Mr. Papantoniou said.

For the European Business Group, the organization of Chicago Booth European Conference 2010 required a considerable amount of time and efforts. Organizing the first European Business Conference has been a challenge, and we would like to thank all the speakers, our sponsors; The Case New Holland / Fiat Group, Deutsche Bank and DSM, the professors, volunteers and participants for helping us to make it happened.  It is the wish of all of us to see this conference become better every year, and that’s why we have already started to work on the next year edition. There are still many challenges and opportunities for EU/US businesses to explore, and we look forward to meeting you again next year!

The European Business Group:

More information:





Chicago Booth European Business Group

24 02 2010

Europe
The European Business Group is a 200+ member student group at Chicago Booth dedicated to promoting cultural and professional exchange with Europe. While our members come from diverse backgrounds, we are unified by a common cultural and professional interest in the countries of Europe.

EBG’s goals for the 2010-2011 school year include:

  • Fostering a sense of European community within Chicago Booth, through social and cultural events;
  • Supporting students in the pursuit of internships and full-time job opportunities in Europe, through activities such as resume reviews, mock interviews, Eurotrek and London Banking Days;
  • Providing guidance to prospective students from Europe; and
  • Engaging corporate recruiters and alumni groups from throughout Europe.

The European Business Group is organizing the Chicago Booth European Conference 2010 on April 12th 2010, in which the former president of Spain, Mr. José María Aznar, will be the keynote speaker.





Unrestricted Work Authorization in the US

9 11 2009
Green Card in the US

Green Card in the US

One of the biggest challenges for international MBA students in the US is landing into a full-time position in a company willing to sponsor their working visa.

Unfortunately, the number of companies willing to sponsor international candidates is very small (except in consulting).

The Myths

1) Visa sponsorship involves additional costs.

FALSE. This is only around 5000 USD, which is much less than the salary they will pay you (hopefully!)

2) It is difficult to justify that you hire a foreigner because the required skills cannot be found in the US.

FALSE. It depends on how specific you are about skills in the visa application. You cannot just justify it based on the requirement to have an MBA degree and experience in industry A, because there are thousands of American falling in that description. But you are much more credible if you say you need somebody with experience developing operations strategy in industry A in country B, with experience dealing with senior management and leading multi-cultural teams, with intra-preneurial experience, fluent in language A and language B, with contacts in industry C, with a diploma thesis in field D… Not surprisingly, the way you write the Visa application influences the result.

The Reason

The main reason why companies choose not to sponsor is because the US Government can refuse a visa application without any explanation. The extension of a previously awarded visa can also be refused without any explanation. Companies do not like taking this risk. Only companies with the resources to lobby the government adequately are comfortable with this risk. The real problem is that the Government is not reliable regarding visa applications.

On top of that, the TARP program (Troubled Asset Release Program) of the US government makes things even more difficult for international MBA students, especially those interested in Banking. The TARP program is a US government initiative to address the subprime mortgage crisis and strengthen its financial sector. TARP states that companies receiving funds under TARP cannot sponsor an international student if they make an American worker redundant.

The Long Term Implications

If you look at American history, this country is currently the number one in the world because it has traditionally sourced talent from anywhere in the world. If this practice stops now, this will no longer be the US in 50 years. It will just be a second range country somewhere in the North of the Gulf of Mexico.

Additional Resources: TARP

Read this interesting  article from scholarship for USA about the impact of TARP program  on job opportunities for international students.





La gestión de los pasaportes en los consulados españoles en China

11 08 2009
Pasaporte español

Pasaporte español

Muchos son los obstáculos que sufre la comunidad española en China. Este artículo pretende hacer una crítica constructiva sobre uno de esos obstáculos: la gestión de los pasaportes en los consulados de España.

España tiene tres consulados en China: Shanghai, cuyo distrito consular abarca unas pocas provincias cercanas a esta ciudad; Hong Kong, que abarca Hong Kong y Macau; y Pekín con jurisdicción sobre el resto del país (4.000 km de Este a Oeste y 3.000 de Norte a Sur).

Este organización, que está determinada en gran medida por el gobierno chino, es muy poco práctica para los españoles que vivimos en la provincia de Guangdong (Cantón), que está a las puertas de Hong Kong pero depende del consulado de  Pekín. Guangdong, que contiene a la tercera metrópolis de la China continental, es posiblemente el mayor polo industrial del mundo, donde se fabrican desde juguetes y productos textiles hasta ordenadores y móviles. Me atrevería a afirmar que todos los españoles tenemos en casa algún producto fabricado en Guangdong. En Guangdong hay muchos españoles y cada vez somos más.

El problema es el siguiente: Por ejemplo, yo resido en Shenzhen, ciudad china fronteriza con Hong Kong. Por motivos tanto de trabajo como personales debo cruzar la frontera 4 ó 6 veces por semana. Cada ida y vuelta son 5 sellos en el pasaporte. Consecuentemente, cada  3 ó 4 meses mi pasaporte ya no tiene páginas libres y tengo que renovarlo.

Con arreglo a la jurisdicción española y presionado por el gobierno chino, el consulado de España en Hong Kong, que sólo dista 1 hora en metro de mi casa, no tiene potestad para renovar mi pasaporte puesto que no tengo permiso de residencia en esa ciudad sino en Shenzhen. Así que debo acudir al consulado de Pekín, que se encuentra a más de 3.000 km. Alternativamente, también puedo renovarlo en España.

Esta paradoja, que es consecuencia directa de la fórmula “un país, dos sistemas”, supone un inconveniente importante para algunos ciudadanos españoles que viven en Guangdong y para hombres de negocios españoles que visitan la famosísima Feria de Cantón y que desgraciadamente les roban o pierden el pasaporte (lo cual no es raro). Pero lo peor de la situación es que nos hace sentir a los españoles en Guangdong un tanto incomprendidos y, hasta cierto punto, desamparados.

Otros países occidentales tienen soluciones para este tipo de problema:

  • El Reino Unido y Australia han previsto un tipo especial de pasaportes con más páginas.
  • Francia, el Reino Unido y EEUU contemplan proporcionar varios pasaportes simultáneos a un mismo ciudadano en casos justificados.
  • Francia envía comitivas a ciudades importantes chinas un día al mes para prestar servicios consulares.
  • El Reino Unido contempla la solicitud o entrega del pasaporte por correo seguro en determinados casos.
  • Finalmente, la mayoría de los países occidentales tienen consulado en Guangzhou (Cantón), ciudad en donde España proyecta desde hace años abrir uno, pero no hay fecha definida para su apertura.

En el consulado de Hong Kong me han atendido siempre muy bien. Me aconsejaron escribir una carta al Ministerio de Exteriores y de Cooperación para informarles de esta situación y así lo hice. También fui invitado por el cónsul de España en Hong Kong, don Juan Luis Flores Arroyuelo, para discutir sobre este tema, quien me recibió muy cordialmente.

Finalmente, quisiera explicar un truco que yo he encontrado para amortiguar este problema. El Departamento de Inmigración de Hong Kong vende unas libretitas que se llaman Hong Kong Travel Pass por unos 500 HKD (aproximadamente 50 Euros). Con el Travel Pass, los tampones de las autoridades de Hong Kong se estampan en esta libretita en vez de en el pasaporte. De esta manera cada ida y vuelta entre Hong Kong y China sólo supone 2 tampones en el pasaporte, que son los de la autoridades chinas. Con este truco, el pasaporte dura 2 veces y media más, lo cual pueden ser unos 9 meses, es decir dos veces y media menos gastos en viajes a Pekín o a España.





Moroccan women, the veil and a deeper dilemma

10 08 2009

Velo I am absolutely a big ignorant about the Arab world. As an ignorant, there is something that has really surprised me when I travelled to Morocco last week:

In Morocco, some women wear the veil, some don’t; some women cover their bodies with long robes (Djellaba) and full headscarves, others wear T-shirt and jeans and other women sunbath in bikini by the swimming pool. All of them seem to live together in the same neighborhood and there is no problem at all.

This wonderful example of tolerance is something that in had already seen in Malaysia. But the difference is that virtually all women are Muslin in Morocco while in Malaysia only half of them are. The rest are Buddhist, Taoist, Hinduists or Christians and, as a result, do not wear the veil.

I enquired some local male individuals about this variety of clothing and I found out that:

  • Both western clothes and burka-like clothes are considered the result of recent foreign influence, either from the West or from more traditional Islamic countries. However the djellaba and the headscarf are tradional Moroccan clothes.
  • Many people are critical to burka-like clothes
  • Many people are open to western clothes and define them as “modern”, which is a very positive definition indeed.
  • Headscarves are not only a religious symbol. They tell you a lot about the political ideas of people wearing them, who are usually conservative.

These different kinds of fashion not only show different kinds of women and different kinds of thinking, but also reflect the debate in Moroccan society about women’s rights, about what means to a woman and what is women’s role in society. Not long time ago, there used to be a very similar debate in western countries. I think it is good this debate arouses also in the Islamic world.

The Moroccan government is worried about a possible expansion of Islamic fundamentalism in Morocco and therefore promotes moderate interpretations of the Islam, like for example showing women with and without headscarves in textbooks. But some conservative people consider this is undermining Morocco’s Islamic traditions.

Headscarves are only a small part of a much deeper dilemma:  should Morocco take laic democracies as a model or should it get inspired in more traditional Islamic countries? Burka-like clothes and bikinis are just a small side effect of these two huge foreign forces influencing Morocco and other Muslim countries in North Africa.

References:

Image: I found the image on teh blogLa Suerte Sonríe a los Audazes





Le Pays Basque: un rêve

9 08 2009

IkurrinaLe Pays Basque est un pays d’immigrants à cause de la richesse économique due, traditionnellement, au commerce du fer. Aux années 60-70 le pays basque a reçu la main d’ouvre des autres régions de l’Espagne. Actuellement nous recevons travailleurs étrangers des quatre coins du monde.

La vie en commun entre les basques qui parlent le basque, et les basques qui se sentent plus a l’aise en espagnol, est par fois difficile. On pourrait parler des faux clichés, des conflits sociaux ou institutionnels, des impositions des uns sur les autres et des autres sur les uns, et malheureusement aussi de la haine, de la peur et du terrorisme. Par contre, moi, je préférais nourrir l’espoir qu’une société plus tolérante avec sa propre diversité est aussi possible.

Depuis longtemps je n’habite pas plus au Pays Basque. J’ai suis allé vivre dans beaucoup de pays. Grâce à mes expériences à l’étranger j’ai développé une vision du monde plus respectueuse et je rêve d’un Pays Basque moderne pour tous.





Is China ready for Democracy?

4 08 2009
Liberty guiding people

"Liberty guiding the people" by Delacroix

This article is very personal and I just want to explain how my personal opinion about this has evolved during my time in China

When I first arrived to China in 2006, I experienced the mindset differences between Hong Kong and the mainland. Generally speaking, Hong Kong people are very considerate with each other, care about community problems and are engaged to resolved them. My impression at that time was that the mainland was far behind Hong Kong on these issues. A five minute walk in Beijing is enough to realize that Chinese people have embraced individualism: traffic is anarchic, some people throw rubbish from the 20th floor, pollution is extremely severe, somebody could even die on a crowded street without people even looking at. (I am of course making an exaggerated caricature of China, which is not intended to offend anybody). At that time, I had the impression that Chinese people do no care much about each other, in comparison with Hong Kong or European people. And democracy is just about caring about the community, nothing else. So, at that time I though that China still needed to continue evolving quite a lot before reaching a level of social awareness that makes democracy possible.

But then something happened that made me change completely my image of China, something that made me very proud of my Chinese co-citizens, something that made me realize the depth of the social changes in China. In 2007, a massive case of child slavery in Chinese factories was discovered. Some years before nobody would have cared much about that. But this time there was a strong public opinion, saying very clearly that that was wrong, showing that Chinese people cared about those children. A public opinion that says what is right and what is wrong is a necessary condition for democracy. It is not possible to have democracy without a social aware public opinion. And that day, for the first time in modern history, China showed the world that it does have an spontaneously driven public opinion.

But this was not just an isolated happening: On March 12th 2008, an earthquake in Sichuan province took 68.000 lives. And the reaction of China, as a society, was exemplar. My colleagues in Shenzhen organized a donation campaign. I saw people donating as much as one month’s full salary! People rushed to the supermarkets to buy Sichuan products! Everybody talked about donating money… This was the first time in Chinese history that such a huge wave of solidarity happened. In 1976 there was an even more destructive earthquake than this but nobody really do much to help victims. This made me even more proud of being, in a certain way, part of China.

I do not mean at all that Chinese society has traditionally been individualist and that it is changing now due to the western influence. Quite the contrary, China has traditional being a very supportive society (Confucian thinking praises solidarity) but this social awareness was neutralized as a result of passing from being poor to be reach in only 30 years, and now those traditional Chinese civic values are coming back, first in the big cities, and later in the country side.

Is China ready for Democracy? My opinion is that many people in big cities are. China is running at a vertiginous speed toward a social awareness that will eventually enable democracy. But due to the size and complexity of the country, it needs just some time. I hope we will see political reforms in the needs decades.

For my impressions about Hong Kong democracy, see: Good Morning Hong Kong Democracy I and II.

Image: “Liberty guiding the people” by Delacroix





The Nordic model of capitalism

2 08 2009

J21-264059Financial Times published on July 30th a very interesting article about the Nordic way of capitalism, which reminded me of a book that I have recently read: Utopia by Thomas More, especially those chapters describing Utopia’s economic and political system.

In fact, the Nordic economic and management model is seen by some scholars as one of the few winners of the current financial crisis and is very different from that of other countries. According to Financial Times, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland (what about Iceland!) are ”Economies that are open to the world and offer greater worker involvement are attracting attention – but benefits are hard to replicate elsewhere”.

The article focused on the strengths and weaknesses of this model.

Strengths:

  • Openness to globalization:
    • Facing a lack of a large domestic country, Nordic companies focus on expanding abroad
    • Aware of negative side of globalization and very proactive. Example: transfer workers of sectors hurt by globalization to other sectors
  • Strong social protection
  • Egalitarianism: There are no real classes distinctions
    • Salary gap between the highest and the lowest earners is relatively small
    • Everybody can get good education.
    • Senior executives are paid well below their counterparts abroad
  • Democratic capitalism: high degree of equality and participation in political and corporate decision making
    • Workers are not afraid to discuss with senior executives
    • Employees sit on the board of companies thanks to heavy trade union presence. Trade unions participation is very mature allowing companies to make restructurings with the cooperation of workers
    • Promotion of women in the boardroom: there is a law-fixed quota
  • Record for bouncing back from strong economic turmoil
    • 1990 crisis in the region was successfully handled in Sweden with a mixture of recapitalization and nationalization without making use of protectionism

Weaknesses:

  • Difficult to export to other countries: Small egalitarian countries with good education system can hardly be found anywhere else.
    • Difficult to convince employees in some countries to embrace the non hierarchical ways: people find imprecise who is taking responsibility or what is the objective
  • The region has historically relied on big companies and has been poor at creating smaller entrepreneurial businesses, which is a weakness in generating employment
  • Generous welfare state is increasingly under pressure from an aging population
  • Cultural homogeneity that makes consensus-based decision-making possible is challenged by the increasing immigration
  • Some Nordic companies are importing aspects of the angle-Saxon model, like reducing tax burden

Generally speaking, democratic capitalism is easier to find in small companies that in big one. Personally, I find democratic capitalism in large Nordic companies very interesting. My experience is that management styles based on authority (Imperial CEO) may erode the workers motivation and productivity. I think this is a weakness of the French and Chinese models, among others. (For information about Chinese working culture see this post)

For those who want to learn more, there is a book called “The Nordic model”, which can be downloaded in pdf from here, and there is also a very good description about the Nordic model on wikipedia.

Image: the image belongs to Xymara.com.





Good Morning Hong Kong democracy! (II)

17 07 2009

Following my post in French about democracy in Hong Kong , I would like to add a video of Anson Chan, a pro-democracy leader in Hong Kong. I met her once in Hong Kong when she was running for the Legislative Council in 2007. I got deeply impressed by her humility and by her smile, which make people feel very close to her. This is something that many politicians fail to do. I agree up to a very large extent to her vision of Hong Kong.





Good morning Hong Kong democracy!

10 07 2009

Now, that I am leaving Hong Kong and China I would like to publish an article of mine about Democracy in Hong Kong that I wrote in 2004 when I first came to Hong Kong. Five years later, I do not exactly think in the same way. But that will be the topic of a future post.

Hong Kong democracy march 2007

Good Morning Hong Kong Democracy

Le premier juillet 1997 il pleuvait sans cesse sur Hong Kong. Quand les ciels se sont ouverts la “Union Jack” n’ondoyait plus au vent de l’Extrême Orient. On avait perdu pour toujours le bijou de la couronne britannique et il y en avait beaucoup qui pleuraient amèrement.

Septe ans se sont passés et plus de choses que la météo ont changé.

Hong Kong a été cédée en 1842 à la Grande Bretagne par l’empereur chinois à la suite
pendant 150 ans la colonie a été gouverné depuis Londres avec censure de presse et interdiction de se manifester.

Quand les tentatives de Margaret Thatcher pour prolonger la cession ont échoués (1984), et surtout à la suite du massacre des manifestants pro démocratie à la place de Tienanmen à Pékin (1989), Chris Patten, le dernier gouverneur britannique à Hong Kong a promulgué en 1990 une mini constitution, appelée “The Basic Law”, qui avait été approuvée par le gouvernement Chinois. D’autres reformes successives, qui ne sont pas reconnues par la Chine, ont permis aux Hongkongais d’élire ses représentants en 1995 pour la premier fois.

Pékin s’est engagé en 1984 à conserver le régime de Hong Kong sur l’accroche “un pays, deux systèmes” pendant 50 ans après le retour de la colonie à la Mère Patrie. L’ancienne colonie est devenue l’actuelle Région Administrative Spécial de Hong Kong (HKSAR). Tung Chi Hua a été désigné gouverneur par le régime de Pékin en 1997. Tung, qui est considéré une marionnette de Pékin, est un multimillionnaire qui représente la fusion entre le colonialisme britannique et la bureaucratie pékinoise. Le model que Tung veut mettre en application à Hong Kong est le micro état de Singapour: un capitalisme sauvage contrôlé par une dictature de fer.

Récemment le gouvernement chinois a interdis aux Hongkongais le droit à élire le successeur de Tung en 2007 et le nouveau “Conseil Législatif” en 2008. Par ailleurs plusieurs activistes pro démocratie et pro droits de l’homme Hongkongais ont été arrêtés, emprisonnés et torturés.

Pour ces raisons, un demi million de citoyens de Hong Kong ont manifestés le jour du septième anniversaire (1er juillet 2004) du retour de Hong Kong à la souveraineté chinoise, dans une massive et passionné marche pour la démocratie et contre l’autoritarisme de Pékin. Pékin croyais que les Hongkongais ne protesteraient pas si on les permettais conserver ses “privilèges” économiques. Les Hongkongais viennent de démontrer que leur liberté n’est pas à vendre.

Tung et ses successeurs (quels qu’ils soient) doivent affronter un terrible dilemme entre la prospérité économique et les limitations des droits politiques: D’un coté les limitations politiques ont des conséquences indéniables sur la confiance des agents économiques étrangers. D’un autre coté si on permet une certaine démocratie à Hong Kong beaucoup du monde en Chine continental commenceront à se poser la question: ”Pourquoi Pékin respecte les souhaites de liberté de Hong Kong mais pas les notres?”

Le future de la démocratie en Chine continental dépend dans une grande mesure de la façon avec laquelle les citoyens de Hong Kong sauront imposer ses libertés à Pékin.

Image: Hong Kong democracy march in 2004. I got the image on bbc.co.uk





Las reflexiones internacionales de Dominique de Villepin y de Christine Lagarde

8 07 2009

En 2006 fui invitado al palacio de Matignon, que es la residencia del Primer Ministro francés, con motivo de la celebración del contrato VIE (Volontariat International en Entreprise) numero 10.000. Mi numero de contrato era próximo al 10.000 y por eso fui invitado. Este es el tipo de contrato con el que yo empecé a trabajar en Hong Kong. Y mi experiencia ha sido maravillosa! En este post explico que es el contrato VIE, una iniciativa que me encantaría ver implantada en España!

Dominique de VillepinEn Matignon, tuve el placer de escuchar un discurso del Primer Ministro de por aquel entonces, que era Dominique de Villepin. Despuéss de los discursos hubo un cocktail en el jardín que fue muy interesante. El Primer Ministro se rodeo de un grupo de VIE, entre los cuales estaba yo, y comenzó a dialogar con todo el mundo con mucho desparapajo y, al mismo tiempo, con mucha elegancia. Lo que mejor recuerdo de aquel corrillo fueron las siguientes palabras de Villepin: “Los franceses estamos muy orgullosos de nuestra lengua y de nuestra cultura pero debemos salir a buscar a los otros y aprender de ellos […]. Por ejemplo, mientras que en otros países las relaciones sociales en la empresa son muy relajadas, en Francia siguen siendo demasiado estrictas. Debemos aprender de los otros”. Esto solo lo podía haber dicho un diplomático de la altura de Villepin, que llevaba media vida viviendo fuera de Francia. No voy a juzgar aqui si las relaciones sociales son demasiado estrictas en Francia o no. Simplemente creo que reflexionar sobre este tema desde una perspectiva internacional, como hizo Villepin, es muy acertado.

Christine LagardeDespués Villepin se marchó y otro corrillo se formó entorno a Christine Lagarde, que en aquel momento era ministra de comercio y en la actualidad es minitra de finanzas. En aquel corrillo la Ministra desveló una personalidad impresionante. La ministra nos contó algunas de sus experiencias mientras trabajaba en Estados Unidos y algunas de ellas me encantaron. Christine Lagarde fue directora de un gabinete internacional de abogados en Chicago y ha sido calificada por Forbes y Newsweek como una de las mujeres más influyentes del Mundo. La ministra me impresionó profundamente. La frase que no olvidaré fue “En Estados Unidos se utiliza mucho la palabra promover pero cuando volví a Francia me sorprendió que aquí se habla más bién de proteger”. Esta frase encierra un diamante.

Estas dos reflexiones hablan de un mismo tema en realidad. Todos los que hemos vivido en Francia hemos de estar de acuerdo con Dominique de Villepin y con Christine Lagarde en que un país debe saber hacer autocritica y promover las buenas practicas, aunque provengan del extranjero, para poder avanzar.

L'invitation du premier ministre
Imagenes: Las fotos provienen de las paginas de Villepin y Lagarde en Wikipedia. La carta de invitación es mia.





Hacer Politica

5 06 2009

Office politics

Hay una expresión inglesa que oigo muy a menudo en Hong Kong y me hace sentir un poco incómodo: “To play politics” o “to play office politics”, lo que se podría traducir como “jugar a la política en la oficina”. Lo que en inglés se

entiende por esta expresión es básicamente lo que en castellano llamaríamos “crispación en la oficina”. Es decir una situación en la que:

  • El ambiente de trabajo es malo
  • Los colegas se echan la culpa los unos a los otros
  • La colegas hace las cosas con el objetivo fundamental de desacreditar al adversario en vez de por hacer las cosas bien
  • Se presta mas atención a detalles insignificantes que a los verdaderos retos de la empresa
  • En las discusión intervienen muchas mas partes de las que son necesarias y cada una de ellas carece de una noción de equipo
  • Se hacen injusticias
  • Se miente
  • Se amenaza

Si bien es cierto que esta situación puede darse en la política, esto no es política. Este tipo de crispación es algo que desgraciadamente puede darse en la empresa de la misma manera que en la política y, probablemente, con una frecuencia no muy diferente.

Esta expresión es tan popular en mi entorno en Hong Kong que cuando oímos la palabra “política” instintivamente pensamos en “juegos políticos en la oficina” en vez en el significado verdadero de la política, que tal y como yo lo entiendo, es algo muy noble. Para mí, la política es administrar un espacio común en beneficio de la sociedad. Yo creo que es necesario saber diferenciar bien entre política y crispación.

Creo que la crispación es un problema que se depende, entre otros factores,

  • del tamaño de la organización
  • de la presencia de problemas globales.
  • de la presencia de intereses privados por encima del interés general

Por ejemplo, yo trabajé en una organización que creció mucho en pocos años. A medida que crecía, más comunes eran los desencuentros entre los empleados. Por si esto fuera poco, después de esta fase de crecimiento, vino una fase de crisis económica que obligó a reducir costes y, consecuentemente, el ambiente de trabajo se degradó. Para llevar a cabo la reducción de costes era necesario buscar la colaboración de todos los departamentos y evitar los nichos de responsabilidad. Y esto trajo consigo más situaciones difíciles de un punto de vista interpersonal que deterioraron un poco más el ambiente.

El problema de la política es que por su naturaleza estas tres condiciones siempre se dan. Lo cual no significa que la política no sea posible sin crispación. Yo creo en la política sin crispación, y creo que la política es un lugar en el que se puede contribuir a hacer nuestra sociedad mas internacional y mas abierta. Por este motivo, en este blog voy a hablar de política pero no voy a caer en la crispación

Imagen: encontré la imagen en IowaBiz





The Erasmus Generation

31 05 2009

Mushroom cloud The other day, a French friend of mine told me: “Nobody who made an Erasmus will ever make a war”

This is a brig truth. The Erasmus program is a European student exchange program established 1987, which allows european students to study one year in a foreign country in Europe. For me, this has been on of the biggest success of the European Union in terms of education.

The Erasmus program is the guarantee that there will never again be any  war in Europe. Those who made the last big war in Europe (1939-45) used to say that the easiest way to convince people to go on war was to tell them that another country was manacing us. This was also the argument used by the Bush administration to attack Irak. Will this argument convince people who have lived abroad in that or another country, who have made friends abroad, who have got in love abroad, who have shared a flat abroad with other international students, who have felt accepted and loved in a foreign country? Of course not.

If you want to know more about the Erasmus experience, I recommend you to watch this French film: l’auberge espagnol

Image: The mushroom cloud of the atomic bomb dropped on NagasakiJapan on August 91945. Taken from wikipedia.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.