Moroccan women, the veil and a deeper dilemma

10 08 2009

Velo I am absolutely a big ignorant about the Arab world. As an ignorant, there is something that has really surprised me when I travelled to Morocco last week:

In Morocco, some women wear the veil, some don’t; some women cover their bodies with long robes (Djellaba) and full headscarves, others wear T-shirt and jeans and other women sunbath in bikini by the swimming pool. All of them seem to live together in the same neighborhood and there is no problem at all.

This wonderful example of tolerance is something that in had already seen in Malaysia. But the difference is that virtually all women are Muslin in Morocco while in Malaysia only half of them are. The rest are Buddhist, Taoist, Hinduists or Christians and, as a result, do not wear the veil.

I enquired some local male individuals about this variety of clothing and I found out that:

  • Both western clothes and burka-like clothes are considered the result of recent foreign influence, either from the West or from more traditional Islamic countries. However the djellaba and the headscarf are tradional Moroccan clothes.
  • Many people are critical to burka-like clothes
  • Many people are open to western clothes and define them as “modern”, which is a very positive definition indeed.
  • Headscarves are not only a religious symbol. They tell you a lot about the political ideas of people wearing them, who are usually conservative.

These different kinds of fashion not only show different kinds of women and different kinds of thinking, but also reflect the debate in Moroccan society about women’s rights, about what means to a woman and what is women’s role in society. Not long time ago, there used to be a very similar debate in western countries. I think it is good this debate arouses also in the Islamic world.

The Moroccan government is worried about a possible expansion of Islamic fundamentalism in Morocco and therefore promotes moderate interpretations of the Islam, like for example showing women with and without headscarves in textbooks. But some conservative people consider this is undermining Morocco’s Islamic traditions.

Headscarves are only a small part of a much deeper dilemma:  should Morocco take laic democracies as a model or should it get inspired in more traditional Islamic countries? Burka-like clothes and bikinis are just a small side effect of these two huge foreign forces influencing Morocco and other Muslim countries in North Africa.

References:

Image: I found the image on teh blogLa Suerte Sonríe a los Audazes





Is China ready for Democracy?

4 08 2009
Liberty guiding people

"Liberty guiding the people" by Delacroix

This article is very personal and I just want to explain how my personal opinion about this has evolved during my time in China

When I first arrived to China in 2006, I experienced the mindset differences between Hong Kong and the mainland. Generally speaking, Hong Kong people are very considerate with each other, care about community problems and are engaged to resolved them. My impression at that time was that the mainland was far behind Hong Kong on these issues. A five minute walk in Beijing is enough to realize that Chinese people have embraced individualism: traffic is anarchic, some people throw rubbish from the 20th floor, pollution is extremely severe, somebody could even die on a crowded street without people even looking at. (I am of course making an exaggerated caricature of China, which is not intended to offend anybody). At that time, I had the impression that Chinese people do no care much about each other, in comparison with Hong Kong or European people. And democracy is just about caring about the community, nothing else. So, at that time I though that China still needed to continue evolving quite a lot before reaching a level of social awareness that makes democracy possible.

But then something happened that made me change completely my image of China, something that made me very proud of my Chinese co-citizens, something that made me realize the depth of the social changes in China. In 2007, a massive case of child slavery in Chinese factories was discovered. Some years before nobody would have cared much about that. But this time there was a strong public opinion, saying very clearly that that was wrong, showing that Chinese people cared about those children. A public opinion that says what is right and what is wrong is a necessary condition for democracy. It is not possible to have democracy without a social aware public opinion. And that day, for the first time in modern history, China showed the world that it does have an spontaneously driven public opinion.

But this was not just an isolated happening: On March 12th 2008, an earthquake in Sichuan province took 68.000 lives. And the reaction of China, as a society, was exemplar. My colleagues in Shenzhen organized a donation campaign. I saw people donating as much as one month’s full salary! People rushed to the supermarkets to buy Sichuan products! Everybody talked about donating money… This was the first time in Chinese history that such a huge wave of solidarity happened. In 1976 there was an even more destructive earthquake than this but nobody really do much to help victims. This made me even more proud of being, in a certain way, part of China.

I do not mean at all that Chinese society has traditionally been individualist and that it is changing now due to the western influence. Quite the contrary, China has traditional being a very supportive society (Confucian thinking praises solidarity) but this social awareness was neutralized as a result of passing from being poor to be reach in only 30 years, and now those traditional Chinese civic values are coming back, first in the big cities, and later in the country side.

Is China ready for Democracy? My opinion is that many people in big cities are. China is running at a vertiginous speed toward a social awareness that will eventually enable democracy. But due to the size and complexity of the country, it needs just some time. I hope we will see political reforms in the needs decades.

For my impressions about Hong Kong democracy, see: Good Morning Hong Kong Democracy I and II.

Image: “Liberty guiding the people” by Delacroix





Good Morning Hong Kong democracy! (II)

17 07 2009

Following my post in French about democracy in Hong Kong , I would like to add a video of Anson Chan, a pro-democracy leader in Hong Kong. I met her once in Hong Kong when she was running for the Legislative Council in 2007. I got deeply impressed by her humility and by her smile, which make people feel very close to her. This is something that many politicians fail to do. I agree up to a very large extent to her vision of Hong Kong.





Good morning Hong Kong democracy!

10 07 2009

Now, that I am leaving Hong Kong and China I would like to publish an article of mine about Democracy in Hong Kong that I wrote in 2004 when I first came to Hong Kong. Five years later, I do not exactly think in the same way. But that will be the topic of a future post.

Hong Kong democracy march 2007

Good Morning Hong Kong Democracy

Le premier juillet 1997 il pleuvait sans cesse sur Hong Kong. Quand les ciels se sont ouverts la “Union Jack” n’ondoyait plus au vent de l’Extrême Orient. On avait perdu pour toujours le bijou de la couronne britannique et il y en avait beaucoup qui pleuraient amèrement.

Septe ans se sont passés et plus de choses que la météo ont changé.

Hong Kong a été cédée en 1842 à la Grande Bretagne par l’empereur chinois à la suite
pendant 150 ans la colonie a été gouverné depuis Londres avec censure de presse et interdiction de se manifester.

Quand les tentatives de Margaret Thatcher pour prolonger la cession ont échoués (1984), et surtout à la suite du massacre des manifestants pro démocratie à la place de Tienanmen à Pékin (1989), Chris Patten, le dernier gouverneur britannique à Hong Kong a promulgué en 1990 une mini constitution, appelée “The Basic Law”, qui avait été approuvée par le gouvernement Chinois. D’autres reformes successives, qui ne sont pas reconnues par la Chine, ont permis aux Hongkongais d’élire ses représentants en 1995 pour la premier fois.

Pékin s’est engagé en 1984 à conserver le régime de Hong Kong sur l’accroche “un pays, deux systèmes” pendant 50 ans après le retour de la colonie à la Mère Patrie. L’ancienne colonie est devenue l’actuelle Région Administrative Spécial de Hong Kong (HKSAR). Tung Chi Hua a été désigné gouverneur par le régime de Pékin en 1997. Tung, qui est considéré une marionnette de Pékin, est un multimillionnaire qui représente la fusion entre le colonialisme britannique et la bureaucratie pékinoise. Le model que Tung veut mettre en application à Hong Kong est le micro état de Singapour: un capitalisme sauvage contrôlé par une dictature de fer.

Récemment le gouvernement chinois a interdis aux Hongkongais le droit à élire le successeur de Tung en 2007 et le nouveau “Conseil Législatif” en 2008. Par ailleurs plusieurs activistes pro démocratie et pro droits de l’homme Hongkongais ont été arrêtés, emprisonnés et torturés.

Pour ces raisons, un demi million de citoyens de Hong Kong ont manifestés le jour du septième anniversaire (1er juillet 2004) du retour de Hong Kong à la souveraineté chinoise, dans une massive et passionné marche pour la démocratie et contre l’autoritarisme de Pékin. Pékin croyais que les Hongkongais ne protesteraient pas si on les permettais conserver ses “privilèges” économiques. Les Hongkongais viennent de démontrer que leur liberté n’est pas à vendre.

Tung et ses successeurs (quels qu’ils soient) doivent affronter un terrible dilemme entre la prospérité économique et les limitations des droits politiques: D’un coté les limitations politiques ont des conséquences indéniables sur la confiance des agents économiques étrangers. D’un autre coté si on permet une certaine démocratie à Hong Kong beaucoup du monde en Chine continental commenceront à se poser la question: ”Pourquoi Pékin respecte les souhaites de liberté de Hong Kong mais pas les notres?”

Le future de la démocratie en Chine continental dépend dans une grande mesure de la façon avec laquelle les citoyens de Hong Kong sauront imposer ses libertés à Pékin.

Image: Hong Kong democracy march in 2004. I got the image on bbc.co.uk








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.